Talk:Civil society

Criteria/levels of fulfillment	max points: 10	max points: 5	points: 0	Assessment
Content - quality of resources &well-founded argumentation:		Text contains interesting points and observations but the work with literature resources is insuffiecient: information is not supported by referencing to the source and also there are sometimes only statements without any specific content, just phrases		5
Context - wide context & core of the problem identified:	problems understood in their inter-relationships although not always clearly expressed			10
Practical relevance	combines general, theoretical knowledge and global features with practical consequences and local context: shows concrete examples and has practical conclusions			10
Focus - strong conclusions:		values behind the topic are not clear; main problems are identified and discussed but there are numerous topics with noclear priority so the conclusions are rather weak		5
Clarity - logical structure of the text:		ideas are sometimes not clear, focus of (every)paragraph need to be more specific; details need to be used in proper context (of other elements and main idea)		5
Critical approach	balanced text: opposing views presented			10
Commitment - ethics (writing) &length (text):		writing process sometimes lacks commitment; time spent on writing might be OK but not properly coordinated effort		5
Individual input & risk-taking - initiative in researching topic:		rather insufficient initiative in finding proper resources (or not cited in the text)		5
Formal features - respecting academic genre:		proper length of paragraphs, sufficient titles and subtitles, but sources not properly cited in the text and in the list of references – citation format not respected		5
Reaction on the peer review - reviewer’s comments respected			not relevant at the moment - not finalized	0
Total (points)				60

--Jana Dlouha 17:06, 26 January 2012 (CET)