Is globalisation a neutral process?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#Do you think the process of globalisation | #Do you think the process of globalisation is naturally neutral or should we interfere in this process? | ||
#If so, | #If so, to what extent should we actually interfere? | ||
#Would you consider colonialism as | #Would you consider colonialism as an early form of globalisation? | ||
#Do you think globalisation is the only reason for terror? | #Do you think globalisation is the only reason for terror? | ||
#Is there a possiblity to minimise the risk of terror or avoid it | #Is there a possiblity to minimise the risk of terror or avoid it altogether even though some countries are or will be excluded from the globalisation process? | ||
#Do you think there is a | #Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job? | ||
#How can emerging countries use | #How can emerging countries use globalisation to overcome the big development differences with industrialised countries? | ||
#From your perspective and experience | #From your perspective and experience does globalisation have the potential to resolve a conflict not related to this phenomenon, for example, the Israel-Palestine conflict, or to possibly make it worse? (We are ignoring terms like globalisation of information, news, culture, weapons and so on…) | ||
#What is the view of the population in | #What is the view of the population in Kuwait on globalisation regarding a win-win-strategy? Do they seek a win-win situation for everybody? | ||
#Is it | #Is it impossible to create fair prices worldwide? Or are the institutions just not willing to change the status quo? If so, is the EU parliament willing and ready to engage? Do you have examples from your work in the EU parliament? | ||
#Are there some examples you can share with us in relation to | #Are there some examples you can share with us in relation to an unjust world trade system and terror in particular? | ||
#Who do you think decides | #Who do you think decides role allocation in this process of globalisation? Do you think some societies hold the main power in their hands or do you think every society has the power to take its place in the process of globalisaton? | ||
#In the face of growing energy demand worldwide, | #In the face of growing energy demand worldwide, what ways are there to ensure energy security for Europe? What role does a strategic partnership with Russia (as intended by Germany) play in this? | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
#What do you think is the most serious globalisation | #What do you think is the most serious failure of globalisation? | ||
#How do you think pre-industrial societies should be integrated in the process of | #How do you think pre-industrial societies should be integrated in the process of globalisation to prevent exclusion and frustration? | ||
#What do you think is the reason for the | #What do you think is the reason for the greater oppportunity to benefit from globalisation for more economically active, educated and rich societies? | ||
#Do you think there is a possibility that | #Do you think there is a possibility that Europe will be marginalised within the 21st century because of its shrinking population? | ||
Revision as of 13:56, 27 November 2009
- Do you think the process of globalisation is naturally neutral or should we interfere in this process?
- If so, to what extent should we actually interfere?
- Would you consider colonialism as an early form of globalisation?
- Do you think globalisation is the only reason for terror?
- Is there a possiblity to minimise the risk of terror or avoid it altogether even though some countries are or will be excluded from the globalisation process?
- Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?
- How can emerging countries use globalisation to overcome the big development differences with industrialised countries?
- From your perspective and experience does globalisation have the potential to resolve a conflict not related to this phenomenon, for example, the Israel-Palestine conflict, or to possibly make it worse? (We are ignoring terms like globalisation of information, news, culture, weapons and so on…)
- What is the view of the population in Kuwait on globalisation regarding a win-win-strategy? Do they seek a win-win situation for everybody?
- Is it impossible to create fair prices worldwide? Or are the institutions just not willing to change the status quo? If so, is the EU parliament willing and ready to engage? Do you have examples from your work in the EU parliament?
- Are there some examples you can share with us in relation to an unjust world trade system and terror in particular?
- Who do you think decides role allocation in this process of globalisation? Do you think some societies hold the main power in their hands or do you think every society has the power to take its place in the process of globalisaton?
- In the face of growing energy demand worldwide, what ways are there to ensure energy security for Europe? What role does a strategic partnership with Russia (as intended by Germany) play in this?
________________
- What do you think is the most serious failure of globalisation?
- How do you think pre-industrial societies should be integrated in the process of globalisation to prevent exclusion and frustration?
- What do you think is the reason for the greater oppportunity to benefit from globalisation for more economically active, educated and rich societies?
- Do you think there is a possibility that Europe will be marginalised within the 21st century because of its shrinking population?