Students:Group Two: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* the Ore Mts. region | * the Ore Mts. region | ||
* peripheries within the countries | |||
* population decrease | * population decrease | ||
* high rate of unemployment | * high rate of unemployment | ||
* aged population | * aged population | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* UNESCO interests | * UNESCO interests | ||
* support of sport activities, cultural events | * support of sport activities, cultural events | ||
== '''Differences between Czech and German side of the border''' == | == '''Differences between Czech and German side of the border''' == | ||
Revision as of 20:01, 4 September 2012
Similarities on both sides of the border - Czech and German
- the Ore Mts. region
- peripheries within the countries
- population decrease
- high rate of unemployment
- aged population
- cross-border interactions
- traditions (toy production)
- lack of long-term planning
- UNESCO interests
- support of sport activities, cultural events
Differences between Czech and German side of the border
- geomorphology (relief)
- natural resources: Germany without coal mining x Czech still coal mining
- tourism: problems in CR, good promotion in G
- history: interrupted continual development
- local businesses (restaurants)
- accomodation capacities (more in G site)
- energy mix definition (renewable resources x non-renewable resources)
- habit of participation on (local) matters
- traditions (from "interrupted" period)
- relationship to land
- religion
- websites (G designed for tourists, CR designed for local citizens)