Students:Kateřina Racková: Difference between revisions
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
The most important difference between organic and conventional farming is that organic farming uses methods friendly to environment, animals and human health! Artificial fertilizers and chemicals such as pesticides are forbiden! Animals can live in a way that does not stress them, they can live together with other animals of the same kind, with enough space around them, with possibility to spend some time outside etc. | The most important difference between organic and conventional farming is that organic farming uses methods friendly to environment, animals and human health! Artificial fertilizers and chemicals such as pesticides are forbiden! Animals can live in a way that does not stress them, they can live together with other animals of the same kind, with enough space around them, with possibility to spend some time outside etc. | ||
When Germany and the Czech Republic are compared, in both countries farmers need to produce crops and breed animals in an organic way for three years and only after they can gain "bio" certifications for their products. In Germany it is easier to sell products directly to customers who are willing to buy them despite the fact bio products are more expensive compared to non-bio. In the Czech Republic it is more difficult for farmers to sell directly to customers so they have to sell part of the production to shops thus gain less profit. Czech people also hesitate to buy bio as it is too expensive and they cannot afford buying bio. | When Germany and the Czech Republic are compared, in both countries farmers need to produce crops and breed animals in an organic way for three years and only after they can gain "bio" certifications for their products. In Germany it is easier to sell products directly to customers who are willing to buy them despite the fact bio products are more expensive compared to non-bio. In the Czech Republic it is more difficult for farmers to sell directly to customers so they have to sell part of the production to shops thus gain less profit. Czech people also hesitate to buy bio as it is too expensive and they cannot afford buying bio. Moreover some of them doubt bio products are more healthy and think they are the same but only with a stick on them. In both countries organic farming represents only a few percent of total production. | ||
In conclusion, situation for bio products and organic farming is more favorable in Germany. However in both countries there still remains a long way to be gone towards sustainable food production. | |||
== Evaluation of the field trip == | == Evaluation of the field trip == |
Revision as of 09:32, 27 June 2013
Personal info
Name and surname: Kateřina Racková
Age: 24
Education: International development studies, Department of development, Faculty of science, Palacký University in Olomouc... (half completed, only diploma thesis needs to be done)
Interests: advanturous travelling around developing countries, technology, nature
Experience: ERASMUS at Sheffield Hallam in the UK: Environmental studies; voluntary projects in Morocco in 2010 and in Ghana in 2012; teaching English and Geography to students of all age groups ranging from nursery to high school
My view of sustainability
Sustainability is an ambiguous concept starting with the basic definition of sustainable development invented by Gro Harlem Bruntland in 1987 in the document "Our common future". According to this document sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the needs of the future generations to meet their needs. This definition is very anthropocentric therefore I prefer definitions which contain also environmental aspect.
In my view all the aspects need to be harmonised. Development should be socially equitable, economically viable and environmentally friendly. Fundamental changes are necessary in order to prevent human race from extinction as our current development is definitelly not sustainable. Both renewable and non-renewable exhaustible resources are being depleted, our industry and agriculture consume more energy than they produce and together with households they produce enormous amount of waste and pollution therefore overload ecosystem services.
Humans need to learn how to live within the Earth`s carrying capacity. The best way how to do that is to let us be inspired by nature. The most perfect and sustainable technologies we try to invent already exist! In addition to technological aspects we also need to change our values and lifestyle from consumer culture to non-materialistic one.
Personally I at least try to recycle, save energy, buy ecologically produced food and use thigs until they break. I am always happy to learn about new sustainable iniciatives therefore I am looking forward to our sustainability field trip to Germany where I hope I can get further inspiration for my efforts to live sustainably.
The best solution is to combine this bottom-up approach with top-down approach. What the world needs most in the present is political will, posibilly widely respected international organisation or a charismatic leader who will desighn and guide us through transition from consumer capitalistic system to sustainability. However, it may be painful process and many people and corporations will fight against the transition...
Day 1 Sunday 9th June
"What a beautiful day!" This was the first day of sustainability field trip to Luneburg in Germany. Very diverse mix of non-Prague students from different universities across the Czech Republic led by Andrew and Dana from Environmental Center of the Charles University decided to visit friendly neighbors to get inspired by their best practices regarding sustainable development. The goal of the field trip was to educate future "leaders" of the Czech Republic! Around 11 AM these future leaders met above Prague train main station and jumped on a minibus which took them to Germany. Their journey was almost eight hours long with a stop in Usti na Labem and a few gas stops in Germany. Students chatted lively during first hours but then they slowly fell asleep and there was a silence...and hot! In the evening group finally arrived, thanks to the skilled driver, to Luneburg Sportspark, their new home for the upcoming week. Such an interesting place! Our group was going to live on a stadium :) After delicious dinner they introduced ourselves in a form of name game. Name game revealed very interesting associations: Delicious Dana, Valuable Veronika, Junk Jarda, Curious Kristýna, Easy Eliška, Jealous Jitka, Clever Cute and Crazy Katie, Dangerous Diana, Magical Meggie, Joyful Jana, Marvelous Martin, Adventurous Agniezska, Doubtful Daniel, Modest Martin and Amiable Andrew. Some of the group members went to sleep and some...coud not fall asleep due to snoring roommates...
Day 2 Monday 10th June
"Day with mixed results." To summarize, second day brought charming German type men, delicious and healthy lunch at Leuphana University mensa, participative workshop at the university but also boring lecture about sustainability in sub-coma state of mind after lunch when at least half of the students almost fell asleep, a quarter channeled all the energy on trying not to fall asleep and the rest seemed to be engaged :D Unfortunatelly for the students of International Development Studies there was no new information about sustainability which contributed largely to sub-coma! On the other hand some of the students certainly discovered new useful information or were inspired to think about sustainability from different perspective.
Day 3 Tuesday 11th June
Programme on Tuesday started at the Leuphana University with a lecture about renewable energy presented by Alexa Lutzenberger. The lecture consisted of many unexplained graphs and was based on unrealistic expectation that Germany is able to cover its energy consumption by renewable resources up to 100 %. If all the countries in the world followed Germany that would tigger world wars for minerals and hurt developing countries which is definitelly unsustainable and immoral practice. After the presetation we went for a campus tour. Second part of the day was far more interesting, actually it was one of the best and most useful experience during the field trip. Excursion to Neu Wulmstorf landfill offered a new view on use of former landfill. The idea to use former landfill and its surface to produce energy and provide recreation is amazing. Excursion was guided by dr. Tilman Wolfsteller, a real expert who explained how PV panels, wind turbines and gas electricity generation works there. In the late afternoon we visited Hamburg where we enjoyed time as tourists and socialized ourselves :)
Day 4 Wednesday 12th June
"Most enriching day of the field trip, visit to rural areas near Luneburg" In the morning group visited Alfred Toepfler Academy of Nature Conservation at Schneverdingen where Susanne Eilers presented the goals and activities of the organisation. The main goal was to involve public in all sustainability projects as participation is elemental for successful outcome. Participation can be achieved by educating children and youth and by involving local inhabitants into decision making through dialogue. The methods organisation uses for education for sustainability are very interesting. Presenter focused predominantly on games. Truly interactive game is for example fishing banks. Personally I have played this game twice and both times we failed. This simulation game indicates how difficult to solve the situation seems to be in reality...
Afterwards group walked to near heathland. There they were introduced to the management of heathland ecosystem which is unique in many ways in comparison with other ecosystems in the region. Soil is fragile therefore people living there need to treat it carefully. Sheep play important role in heathland as they keep grass short thus contribute to preservation of landscape. Enjoyable moment came when group met a shepard with his sheep and shepard dogs who set direction for sheep by running around them.
The best part of whole field trip took place in Baukhof biodynamic farm where Ralf Weber presented specialities of the farm. Firstly group had delicious organic lunch which consisted of pumpkin soup with home-made wholemeal bread and baked apple dessert. Ralf and his family and other families rent the farm from association who ownes the land. On the farm cows and chickens are breed and grain including spelt grown. Furthermore Ralf explained principles of organic farming: no herbicides, no pecticides, no artificial fertilizers and animals must be fed with own-produced food :)
Day 5 Thursday 13th June
Thursday morning started at Leuphana University by listening to presentation by local German Green Party member Mr. Sebastian Heilmann. During his presentation students discovered that Green Party is relatively popular in Germany in comparison with the Czech Republic where Green Party has been discredited in recent years :( In Germany Green Party usually wins approximately 10 to 13 % of votes and in Luneburg the number is even more optimistic: 28 %! Following presentation by NGO DialogueS (Dialogue Sutainability) informed students about goals and activites of the organisation. Its main goal is to ensure participation off all stakeholders in sustainability dialogue at local scale. In the afternoon group visited Hamburg for second time however this time students were actively involved in field trip activities. Their task was to appropriately answer questions related to IBA - International Housing Exhibition. As title suggests IBA is the exhibition of newly built modern houses allocated in one of the Hamburg districts along Elbe. It is German attempt to address the most pressing issues of the present: cities and climate change and cosmopolis. Houses use renewable energy sources, methods for saving energy and at the same time they are meant to be affordable for middle income segment of society. On the other hand they are still located in busy parts of the city therefore inhabitants would have to live with noise and polluted air. It is questionable whether such housing is sustainable for the future human health.
Day 6 Friday 14th June
Last session of the field trip took place at Lephana University where students had chance to participate in an interactive workshop prepared by local Phd candidates: Sarah, Lotte and Jana. They introduced their research topics: renewable energy, organic agriculture and sustainable entrepreneurship - all at local scale. Afterwards students discussed some aspects of the mentioned topics in a form of world cafe. In the very end Dana and Andrew summarized field trip and its financing and Andrew added another task to complete (in addition to diary). In the early afternoon group left Luneburg and during ride back home students were thinking about what they learned and how that could be applied in Czech context... Thank you Dana and Andrew for organizing this amazing field trip and big thanks goes to MOSUR and EU for providing finance :)
Topic: Organic farming in Germany and Czech Republic
Nowadays increasingly more people are interested in “green” lifestyle. Desire to return back to the roots, back to nature, stems from the fact that people start to realize that conventional lifestyle in developed countries is neither sustainable nor healthy. Eating healthy and sustainably produced food is definitely part of alternative “green” lifestyle.
The most important difference between organic and conventional farming is that organic farming uses methods friendly to environment, animals and human health! Artificial fertilizers and chemicals such as pesticides are forbiden! Animals can live in a way that does not stress them, they can live together with other animals of the same kind, with enough space around them, with possibility to spend some time outside etc.
When Germany and the Czech Republic are compared, in both countries farmers need to produce crops and breed animals in an organic way for three years and only after they can gain "bio" certifications for their products. In Germany it is easier to sell products directly to customers who are willing to buy them despite the fact bio products are more expensive compared to non-bio. In the Czech Republic it is more difficult for farmers to sell directly to customers so they have to sell part of the production to shops thus gain less profit. Czech people also hesitate to buy bio as it is too expensive and they cannot afford buying bio. Moreover some of them doubt bio products are more healthy and think they are the same but only with a stick on them. In both countries organic farming represents only a few percent of total production.
In conclusion, situation for bio products and organic farming is more favorable in Germany. However in both countries there still remains a long way to be gone towards sustainable food production.
Evaluation of the field trip
Lectures were all relevant to the issue of sustainability, included balanced topics and led by experts. Balance between university and field lectures was reached though I would rather prefer more field lectures to university ones…
Social life and free time – the second best aspect of the trip beside enriching sustainability lectures. I appreciate we all had a chance to meet new similarly thinking people with different backgrounds, discuss, work and play together I also value adequate amount of free time when we had a chance to experience Hamburg and Luneburg.
Accommodation was adequate, in comparison with field trips where I have had a chance to participate rooms and sanitary facilities in Luneburg Sportspark were of higher standard and there was nothing to complain about.
Food could be recommended as it was delicious and I liked the way how it was served: self-served. Due to the fact we could decide about serving size, there was barely any food left. We ate “green” (multigrain rolls, vegetables and local products) and in a “green” way in accordance with sustainability paradigm.
Transport by a bus was the only suitable way for trip realisation as we had to move from one place to another almost every day and it would be difficult to do that on time with public transport. On the other hand it was not “green” at all