Ethiopia: Deforestation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[File:Ethiopia in its region.svg|thumb|Ethiopia in its region]] | [[File:Ethiopia in its region.svg|thumb|Ethiopia in its region]] | ||
[[File:Ethiopia shaded relief map 1999, CIA.jpg|thumb|Map of Ethiopia]] | [[File:Ethiopia shaded relief map 1999, CIA.jpg|thumb|Map of Ethiopia]] | ||
[[File:Ethiopia regions numbered.png|thumb|left|Ethiopian regions]] | |||
[[File:Ethiopian highlands 01 mod.jpg|thumb|The Ethiopian Highlands]] | [[File:Ethiopian highlands 01 mod.jpg|thumb|The Ethiopian Highlands]] | ||
[[File:Selassie.jpg|thumb|Emperor Haile Selassie]] | [[File:Selassie.jpg|thumb|Emperor Haile Selassie]] | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == |
Revision as of 15:04, 31 October 2012
UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
Introduction
The theme of least developed countries (LDCs) and developing countries is important within the globalisation debate – they are often considered to be more-or-less passive spectators to, and some might say victims of, global economic development fuelled by the predominant growth-at-all-costs and market-driven economic paradigm. Forestry and agriculture naturally continue to be the primary source of resources and income for people living in LDCs, yet are subject to huge pressure from the forces of globalisation whether in the form of planetary environmental challenges, access to international finance and markets, the emphasis on cashcropping ahead of internal food security, global conflict, and acceptance of aid and Structural Adjustment Programmes, among others. Ethiopia and the state of its forests is a case where we can see these pressures played out.
Globalisation
This is a complex phenomenon and can be viewed from different (disciplinary) perspectives. Our viewpoint is that it has a direct impact at the local level – on the quality of life in diverse parts of the world.
Economics is the driving force of globalisation processes. However, the economy looks different from a global as opposed to the local perspective: due to on-going trade liberalisation and increasing opportunities for investment across national borders, the global production and distribution network has become even more interconnected, its efficiency has (arguably) increased, and it no longer takes heed of boundaries and borders; the globalised economic maximizes its profit but also delivers cheap goods to underdeveloped regions. However, from the local perspective, globalised economic processes might hinder local initiatives as it neglects the local specific context – social, cultural and political conditions, and of course the traditional economy based on those same conditions. In the past, tariffs would have been imposed on imports to developing countries in order to nurture and incubate local industry and hence protect it from foreign competition, just as new industries had once been protected in developed societies, but the demands of the global economy and the World Trade Organization require the opening up of markets in developing nations to the full force of global competition. Globalisation in a certain sense means universalization, and its economic imperatives can destroy local diversity, which often means neglecting local consumption needs or patterns. Something of this phenomenon can be perceived in the situation as it pertains today to the state of forest cover in Ethiopia, although other global themes are present also, not the least of which include the effect of global conflict and population growth.
The problem of deforestation in Ethiopia
Despite its image in the West as a dry nation highly susceptible to drought, Ethiopia actually has a very diverse environment a geographic makeup.