“The Low Price” of the textile discounter KiK – consequences for labour conditions in textile factories in Bangladesh: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:
“The largest discounters pay their suppliers up to 15-20 percent less for their goods than normal department stores (ActionAid,2007, p.16). Because of the great amounts of goods they can order, they are able to force down purchasing prices to an enormous extent.”<br>”Suppliers in developing countries are becoming increasingly dependent on a few multinationals and their importers. With continually decreasing prices, they force down wages. Ultimately, it is the garment workers in the factories who suffer.”<ref>Who pays for our clothing from Lidl and KIK? Published at Kampagne für Saubere-Kleidung (Clean Clothes Campaign; CCC). Published as brochure at January 1st, 2008: http://www.saubere-kleidung.de/downloads/publikationen/2008-01_Brosch-Lidl-KiK_en.pdf (p. 10)</ref>  
“The largest discounters pay their suppliers up to 15-20 percent less for their goods than normal department stores (ActionAid,2007, p.16). Because of the great amounts of goods they can order, they are able to force down purchasing prices to an enormous extent.”<br>”Suppliers in developing countries are becoming increasingly dependent on a few multinationals and their importers. With continually decreasing prices, they force down wages. Ultimately, it is the garment workers in the factories who suffer.”<ref>Who pays for our clothing from Lidl and KIK? Published at Kampagne für Saubere-Kleidung (Clean Clothes Campaign; CCC). Published as brochure at January 1st, 2008: http://www.saubere-kleidung.de/downloads/publikationen/2008-01_Brosch-Lidl-KiK_en.pdf (p. 10)</ref>  


“The phase-out of quotas led to price reductions and strong competition among the poor countries that export clothing and whose national income is heavily dependent on exports.” “The poor countries, competing to retain their clothing industry, try to offer the lowest wages. If, however, one looks at the various cost components from the viewpoint of the buyer/company, wages only account for 0.5-1 percent of the ultimate selling price of the product, as the following chart illustrates. In contrast, marketing and advertising, as well as the profit for the company in Germany/ Europe amount to about 25 percent of the endselling price. An increase in wages is, therefore “peanuts” in the eyes of the buyer.” <ref>Who pays for our clothing from Lidl and KIK? Published at Kampagne für Saubere-Kleidung (Clean Clothes Campaign; CCC). Published as brochure at January 1st, 2008: http://www.saubere-kleidung.de/downloads/publikationen/2008-01_Brosch-Lidl-KiK_en.pdf (p. 13)</ref><br><br>  
“The phase-out of quotas led to price reductions and strong competition among the poor countries that export clothing and whose national income is heavily dependent on exports.” “The poor countries, competing to retain their clothing industry, try to offer the lowest wages. If, however, one looks at the various cost components from the viewpoint of the buyer/company, wages only account for 0.5-1 percent of the ultimate selling price of the product, as the following chart illustrates. In contrast, marketing and advertising, as well as the profit for the company in Germany/ Europe amount to about 25 percent of the endselling price. An increase in wages is, therefore “peanuts” in the eyes of the buyer.” <ref>Who pays for our clothing from Lidl and KIK? Published at Kampagne für Saubere-Kleidung (Clean Clothes Campaign; CCC). Published as brochure at January 1st, 2008: http://www.saubere-kleidung.de/downloads/publikationen/2008-01_Brosch-Lidl-KiK_en.pdf (p. 13)</ref><br><br> <br>  
<br>  


[[File:costs.jpg]]
[[Image:Costs.jpg|frame|center|800x400px]]  
 
===  ===
 
===  ===
 
===  ===
 
===  ===


=== References<br>  ===
=== References<br>  ===
90

edits