Talk:Is globalisation a neutral process?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Svea Wehling: Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win …') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win situation is realistic?" include the same idea. I would like to know what Jana Hybášková thinks about the aim of interfering with the globalisation process. | Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win situation is realistic?" include the same idea. I would like to know what Jana Hybášková thinks about the aim of interfering with the globalisation process. | ||
Secondly the question "Globalization and the conflict between Christian and Muslim society - how are these facts connected to each other?" is now up-to-date refering to the minaret controversy and the aproval of the referendum a couple of days ago. (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaret_controversy_in_Switzerland]) | |||
Revision as of 14:56, 2 December 2009
Svea Wehling:
Maybe the questions "Do you think there is a win-win strategy or do we just need to aim for one to make the best of a bad job?" and "Do you think a future win-win situation is realistic?" include the same idea. I would like to know what Jana Hybášková thinks about the aim of interfering with the globalisation process. Secondly the question "Globalization and the conflict between Christian and Muslim society - how are these facts connected to each other?" is now up-to-date refering to the minaret controversy and the aproval of the referendum a couple of days ago. (see [1])