VCSEwiki:Peer review form for case studies: Difference between revisions

From VCSEwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Used for Case study review process in 2010/2011 course {| border=1 | '''Criteria''' || '''Quality aspects to be considered in the case study''' || '''High/Medium/Low''' || ...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Used for Case study review process in 2010/2011 course
__NOTOC__
=== Outline of review criteria for Case study review ===
{| border=1
{| border=1
  | '''Criteria''' || '''Quality aspects to be considered in the case study''' || '''High/Medium/Low''' ||         
  | '''Criteria''' || '''Quality aspects to be considered in the case study''' || '''High/Medium/Low''' ||         
Line 12: Line 13:
  | '''Practical relevance''' || Main goal of the case study writing is transmitting of some practical experience – was this goal fulfilled? || ||               
  | '''Practical relevance''' || Main goal of the case study writing is transmitting of some practical experience – was this goal fulfilled? || ||               
  |-
  |-
  | '''Focus''' || 'Core problem of the case identified   conclusions made it explicit and transferable. || ||             
  | '''Focus''' || Core problem of the case identified.
Conclusions made it explicit and transferable.  
|| ||             
  |-
  |-
  | '''Clarity''' || Logical structure: from description to generalization and posing analytical questions.
  | '''Clarity''' || Logical structure: from description to generalization and posing analytical questions.
Line 31: Line 34:


|}
|}
==Form for students' evaluation==
- just copy and paste (from editing mode), and fill in you assessment in relevant column!
{| border=1
| '''Criteria''' || '''High/Medium/Low''' ||       
|-
| '''Content'''|| 10 / 5 / 0 ||
|-
| '''Context''' || ||         
|-
| '''Practical relevance''' || ||             
|-
| '''Focus''' || ||           
|-
| '''Clarity''' || ||         
|-
| '''Critical approach''' || ||         
|-
| '''Elaborateness (commitment) ''' || ||           
|-
| '''Individual input & risk-taking ''' || || 
|-
| '''Reader's attractiveness''' || ||                   
|-
| '''Formal features ''' || ||             
|-
| '''Total (points)''' || '''max 100''' ||             
|}
=== Written Comments for Author(s) ===
.....................................................................................
=== General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): ===
1. Acceptable as is
2. Acceptable with minor modifications
3. Might be accepted after major modifications
4. Unacceptable (provide reasons):
.....................................................................................

Latest revision as of 12:01, 30 August 2017

Outline of review criteria for Case study review

Criteria Quality aspects to be considered in the case study High/Medium/Low
Content The content of the case study is relevant for this genre.

Good resources for this type of writing – both describe the real case and provide more general reflection. Resources well used – important features selected, arguments justified on them.

10 / 5 / 0
Context Local and global circumstances of the problem sufficiently described; general (theoretical) background outlined.
Practical relevance Main goal of the case study writing is transmitting of some practical experience – was this goal fulfilled?
Focus Core problem of the case identified.

Conclusions made it explicit and transferable.

Clarity Logical structure: from description to generalization and posing analytical questions.

Formally coherent (paragraphs and ideas connected)

Critical approach No bias, opposing views presented.
Elaborateness (commitment) Sufficient length and number of resources, details elaborated.
Individual input & risk-taking New themes, ideas, original (but justified) conclusions…
Reader's attractiveness Did you enjoy reading the case study? To which extent?
Formal features Structure, headlines, citation norms, language
Total (points) max 100


Form for students' evaluation

- just copy and paste (from editing mode), and fill in you assessment in relevant column!

Criteria High/Medium/Low
Content 10 / 5 / 0
Context
Practical relevance
Focus
Clarity
Critical approach
Elaborateness (commitment)
Individual input & risk-taking
Reader's attractiveness
Formal features
Total (points) max 100


Written Comments for Author(s)

.....................................................................................

General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option):

1. Acceptable as is

2. Acceptable with minor modifications

3. Might be accepted after major modifications

4. Unacceptable (provide reasons):

.....................................................................................

Retrieved from "https://vcsewiki.czp.cuni.cz/w/index.php?title=VCSEwiki:Peer_review_form_for_case_studies&oldid=5296"