Students:Reframing workshop: Difference between revisions

From VCSEwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "3 groups of students representing: *Environmental capital *Ecological capital *Social capital For our case: identify resources, processes, products or benefits, mutual interre...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
"Workshop setting which allows participants to explore different analytical frameworks and refine their problem perception."<ref>Ridder, D., Mostert, E., & Wolters, H. A. (2005). Learning together to manage together. Improving participation in water management. Harmonizing Collaborative Planning European Project. University of Osnabrück (Eds), Osnabrück, Germany. Available from http://www.harmonicop.uni-osnabrueck.de/handbook.php</ref>
''Do you se the glass half empty, or half full? Reframing is the art of turning problems into possibilities.''
== Workshop setting ==
3 groups of students representing:
3 groups of students representing:
*Environmental capital
*Environmental capital
*Ecological capital
*Ecological capital
*Social capital
*Social capital
For our case: identify resources, processes, products or benefits, mutual interrelations of or within each of them.
Each group should: identify resources, processes, products or benefits, mutual interrelations of or within each of the concepts - relevant for our case.


Which development goals are associated with them? Are there in principle 3 different development scenarios? Or do they empower each other?
Which development goals are associated with them? Are there 3 (in principle) different development scenarios? Or do they empower each other?


== Issue (brown coal mining) from diverse perspectives (envi, eco social capital)==
== Issue (brown coal mining) from diverse perspectives (envi, eco, social)==
 
*Which of the perspectives contradict to the other(s)?
*Which of the perspectives contradict each other?
*Are there any stakeholders that perceive situation mainly from one of these viewpoints?
*Are there any stakeholders that perceive situation mainly from one of these viewpoints?
*Pay attention to social capital – how is it related to other two?
*Pay attention to social capital – how is it related to the other two?
*SD strategies should include all 3 dimensions – how links between them should be established? Is there any integrative perspective?
*Sustainable development strategies should include all 3 dimensions – how is it possible to outline links between them? Is there any integrative perspective?


== Analysis of mind maps and cases by individual stakeholders ==
== Analysis of mind maps and cases by individual stakeholders ==
Line 18: Line 22:
#Reveal “hidden paradigms” under stakeholder perceptions: envi, eco social capital.
#Reveal “hidden paradigms” under stakeholder perceptions: envi, eco social capital.
#Where the conflict in these assumptions causes the conflict in real activities and future perspectives?
#Where the conflict in these assumptions causes the conflict in real activities and future perspectives?
#3 development scenarios (social = integrative?, economic = socially destructive?) - how are affected by the “hidden paradigms”?
#Analyse 3 development scenarios (social = integrative?, economic = socially destructive?) - how are affected by the “hidden paradigms”?
 
== References ==
<references/>

Revision as of 12:33, 27 August 2012

"Workshop setting which allows participants to explore different analytical frameworks and refine their problem perception."[1]

Do you se the glass half empty, or half full? Reframing is the art of turning problems into possibilities.

Workshop setting

3 groups of students representing:

  • Environmental capital
  • Ecological capital
  • Social capital

Each group should: identify resources, processes, products or benefits, mutual interrelations of or within each of the concepts - relevant for our case.

Which development goals are associated with them? Are there 3 (in principle) different development scenarios? Or do they empower each other?

Issue (brown coal mining) from diverse perspectives (envi, eco, social)

  • Which of the perspectives contradict to the other(s)?
  • Are there any stakeholders that perceive situation mainly from one of these viewpoints?
  • Pay attention to social capital – how is it related to the other two?
  • Sustainable development strategies should include all 3 dimensions – how is it possible to outline links between them? Is there any integrative perspective?

Analysis of mind maps and cases by individual stakeholders

3 perspectives to be indentified within case studies, mind maps, development scenarios ...:

  1. Reveal “hidden paradigms” under stakeholder perceptions: envi, eco social capital.
  2. Where the conflict in these assumptions causes the conflict in real activities and future perspectives?
  3. Analyse 3 development scenarios (social = integrative?, economic = socially destructive?) - how are affected by the “hidden paradigms”?

References

  1. Ridder, D., Mostert, E., & Wolters, H. A. (2005). Learning together to manage together. Improving participation in water management. Harmonizing Collaborative Planning European Project. University of Osnabrück (Eds), Osnabrück, Germany. Available from http://www.harmonicop.uni-osnabrueck.de/handbook.php