Students:Reframing workshop: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "3 groups of students representing: *Environmental capital *Ecological capital *Social capital For our case: identify resources, processes, products or benefits, mutual interre...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 10:45, 27 August 2012
3 groups of students representing:
- Environmental capital
- Ecological capital
- Social capital
For our case: identify resources, processes, products or benefits, mutual interrelations of or within each of them.
Which development goals are associated with them? Are there in principle 3 different development scenarios? Or do they empower each other?
Issue (brown coal mining) from diverse perspectives (envi, eco social capital)
- Which of the perspectives contradict each other?
- Are there any stakeholders that perceive situation mainly from one of these viewpoints?
- Pay attention to social capital – how is it related to other two?
- SD strategies should include all 3 dimensions – how links between them should be established? Is there any integrative perspective?
Analysis of mind maps and cases by individual stakeholders
3 perspectives to be indentified within case studies, mind maps, development scenarios ...:
- Reveal “hidden paradigms” under stakeholder perceptions: envi, eco social capital.
- Where the conflict in these assumptions causes the conflict in real activities and future perspectives?
- 3 development scenarios (social = integrative?, economic = socially destructive?) - how are affected by the “hidden paradigms”?