445
edits
Talk:Society and Globalization: Difference between revisions
Talk:Society and Globalization (view source)
Revision as of 15:40, 14 January 2010
, 15:40, 14 January 2010no edit summary
No edit summary |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Paper title: Society and Globalization == | |||
'''Reviewer´s assessment:''' | |||
Reviewer´s assessment: | |||
1. Basic criteria | 1. Basic criteria | ||
| Line 20: | Line 12: | ||
1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low) '''high''' | 1.4. Quality of the text from the formal point of view (see below) (High/Medium/Low) '''high''' | ||
2. Summary Comments for Author(s) | 2. Summary Comments for Author(s) | ||
| Line 43: | Line 34: | ||
2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) (Yes/No) '''yes''' | 2.8. Meets submission requirements (abstract, length, style, citation rules) (Yes/No) '''yes''' | ||
3. Written Comments for Author(s) | 3. Written Comments for Author(s) | ||
| Line 67: | Line 57: | ||
But all in all I really have to say that this is a felicitous essay with interesting ideas, excellent quotations and a very good structure. | But all in all I really have to say that this is a felicitous essay with interesting ideas, excellent quotations and a very good structure. | ||
4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | 4. General Recommendation for articles (highlight one option): | ||
| Line 86: | Line 75: | ||
--[[User:Cori|Cori]] 17:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Cori|Cori]] 17:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Assessment from January 4th == | |||
Remarks: | |||
Your article is about individual freedom which is (as you have recognized very brightly) attached to the personal ethics – to be free the human being needs to realize that he/she is not depending on some abstract or concrete forces (including economical), on the contrary, he/she could shape these forces by individual decision. Individual freedom is a value that should be protected within a “logic of globalisation” and it is probably most difficult when you are “logically” part of the process. | |||
Maybe your proposal could be extended into an attempt to create a new “global” culture with its specific values based on solidarity of people worldwide. It is a pity that this culture relies on values related to consumption – but what could we do if it is the only thing we have in common? Or is there something else that we could share globally? | |||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 14:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Assessment from December 8th == | |||
The text is really interesting, even working "methodologically" analyzing the term "Globalization". My only remark - it starts with all of the social problems and finish with only one - how not to feel quilty as a winner of globalisation? | |||
You could write something as an interface - winners obviously have some political power or instruments, so maybe your "behaviorist" solution would have limited impact on the state of affairs (or document the opposit). It is more the way how to live honestly within all these processess. Then you might mention some psychological features connected to the problem. | |||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 11:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||