445
edits
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{| border=1 | '''Criteria/levels of fulfillment''' || max points: 10 || max points: 5 || points: 0 || '''Assessment''' || |- | '''Content'''|| '''quality of resources ...") |
Jana Dlouha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| '''Content'''|| '''quality of resources &well-founded argumentation''': the authors have worked with literature properly: text is based on extensive list of references properly cited; statements are documented by appropriate citations and so essential arguments are based on reliable resources found specifically for this particular research; real data presented || || || 10 || | | '''Content'''|| '''quality of resources &well-founded argumentation''': the authors have worked with literature properly: text is based on extensive list of references properly cited; statements are documented by appropriate citations and so essential arguments are based on reliable resources found specifically for this particular research; real data presented || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Context''' || '''wide context & core of the problem identified''': problems understood in their inter-relationships, specific information fits into the whole picture | | '''Context''' || '''wide context & core of the problem identified''': whole range of issues related to the topic was covered; problems understood in their inter-relationships, specific information fits into the whole picture || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Practical relevance''' || combines '''general principles & driving forces''' and global features with '''practical consequences''' and local context: information about various aspects of the mining industry supports practical conclusions || || || 10 || | | '''Practical relevance''' || combines '''general principles & driving forces''' and global features with '''practical consequences''' and local context: information about various aspects of the mining industry supports practical conclusions and solutions || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Focus''' || '''strong conclusions''': values behind the topic | | '''Focus''' || '''strong conclusions''': research question is clear, values behind the topic can be traced; main problems identified and addressed; through balanced structure and critical argumentation clear conclusions are derived || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Clarity''' || '''logical structure''' of the text: ideas are clear, (every) paragraph declares a separate point; detail adds to the main idea, elements are in the right place. Text is balanced, proper lenght of each part, and some gradation could be observed || || || 10 || | | '''Clarity''' || '''logical structure''' of the text: ideas are clear, (every) paragraph declares a separate point; detail adds to the main idea, elements are in the right place. Text is balanced, proper lenght of each part, and some gradation could be observed || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Critical approach''' || '''balanced text''': problems presented from diverse perspectives | | '''Critical approach''' || '''balanced text''': problems presented from diverse perspectives and based on objective data and findings|| || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Commitment ''' || '''ethics (writing) &length (text)''': writing process was constructive, held in dialogue and respect to the | | '''Commitment ''' || '''ethics (writing) &length (text)''': writing process was constructive, held in dialogue and respect to the partner; time spent on writing above average || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Individual input & risk-taking ''' || '''initiative in researching topic''': independent work with resources, new perspectives opened || || || 10 || | | '''Individual input & risk-taking ''' || '''initiative in researching topic''': independent work with resources, new perspectives opened || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Formal features ''' || respecting '''academic genre''': proper structure - | | '''Formal features ''' || respecting '''academic genre''': proper structure - introduction, discussion of the problem, and conlusion, well-defined paragraphs, sufficient titles and subtitles, sources properly cited in the text and in the list of references – citation format respected almost in all cases but some of the citations are missing (were only in the text, not list of references) || || || 8 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Reaction on the peer review ''' || '''reviewer’s comments respected''' - there was reaction on the comments by the teacher || || || 10 || | | '''Reaction on the peer review ''' || '''reviewer’s comments respected''' - there was reaction on the comments by the teacher which meant rather extensive reorganization of the text || || || 10 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Total (points)''' || || || || '''98''' || | | '''Total (points)''' || || || || '''98''' || | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Hello, there were only two of | Hello, there were only two of you working very self-dependently on the theme which was one of the most difficult of all explored by students in this course. You have done your work very well, thanks for your commitment! | ||
--[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 05:52, 27 January 2012 (CET) | --[[User:Jana Dlouha|Jana Dlouha]] 05:52, 27 January 2012 (CET) |
edits